|
View the H-Southern-Music Discussion Logs by month
View the Prior Message in H-Southern-Music's March 2006 logs by: [date] [author] [thread] View the Next Message in H-Southern-Music's March 2006 logs by: [date] [author] [thread] Visit the H-Southern-Music home page.
I, too, have hesitated to jump into the discussion about whether Woody Guthrie is a country singer, certainly not from any fear of skewing the conversation, but because I once had to be physically separated from my opposite number in an argument about this very question. (We have since reconciled and she is following this discussion with some satisfaction, I think, through forwarded posts.) I also believe that it is a distortion to call Woody Guthrie a country singer. It strikes me that any consideration of genre has to include not only musicological criteria but also issues of audience and industry. On the latter point, although Guthrie emerged from the same channels (no pun intended) that produced many hillbillies, his recording career was built primarily through Moe Asch at Folkways and his work with the Almanac Singers, and it is to that promotional machinery and the audience it served that he owes his lasting prominence. In short, on the production end, Guthrie is clearly associated with the "art world" of folk rather than that of commercial country. As to audience, I am reminded of Simon Frith's observation that musical genres "must refer to an implied community," and that they offer their listeners "a part in some social narrative." I have no doubt that a good number of country devotees enjoyed Guthrie's music and that they identified with his personal history as an Okie. But the social narrative he offered in his work was not the one I believe the bulk of the country audience embraced: an acceptance of postwar consumerism and capitalism and an effort to achieve success within that system (though I will grant that most felt entitled to or were unaware of the government assistance they received in that quest). I think it is only fair to take seriously the audience's own definition of genre boundaries, even if that includes a political dimension. Finally, while I agree that any kind of political litmus test for determining genre boundaries is simplistic, I do think that there is an important aesthetic component of country that is politically informed. Commercial country in the 1940s and 1950s, and arguably even earlier, included an embrace of commercialism, consumerism, and middle-class ambitions and respectability in both its visual and lyrical aesthetics. One has only to look at a couple of Nudie suits to know that part of country's appeal was its embrace (ambivalent though it sometimes was) of materialism as a road to respectability and even personal fulfillment. I think Woody Guthrie consciously disassociated himself with that aesthetic. But maybe he was just alt.country before his time. Diane Pecknold University of Louisville
|